It is with deep sadness that we must share the news that today, March 13th we experienced a devastating fire in our UK distribution facility. Due to this massive loss of inventory, we will not be able to fulfill current orders.

Within the next 24 hours we will begin refunding all orders in our system that have not yet shipped. Please be patient during this process. You do not need to contact our Admin support, we will refund all orders that have not been shipped.

Your outpouring of support for UR and your loyalty to our UR products has moved us deeply. We appreciate your thoughts and prayers as we work to recover and bring our business back stronger than ever.

We are currently assessing the impact of the damage and we will bring up updates on our recovery plan in the coming days.

Our Clinical Trials



First of all, we do care about rats a$$’s... that’s why we only test on humans ;-)

Tons of companies do clinical trials!!... right?!

It’s easy to assume, but let’s have a better look.

99% of the claims from other companies are either that their products are “Scientifically Proven” or they’ve done “Consumer Trials” so we wanted to dig a little deeper with you to understand the difference.

Scientifically Proven: Generally speaking, it usually means the piece of text was not written by real scientists. Science doesn’t really do “proof”, it does “disproof”.

Let’s take an example... ’someone thinks that all swans are white.’ So, they go and have a look at a swan, then another, next it’s ten more, finally how about a hundred more. It turns out all the swans they saw were white. Does that prove all swans are white? No, it fits in with what they thought at first, but it doesn’t PROVE anything. Finding just one black swan, however, conclusively disproves it.

“Scientifically Proven” is more of an advertising phrase than a scientific one.

Consumer Trial or Survey: These are where companies or brands group their customers, ask them to use the product and report back. Very simple but often completely unregulated and open to a lot of biases and influence.

Independent Clinical Trial: Products are sent off to an authorised independent test company. This company has no connection or financial gain to the product (other than to test it). The products are tested on human subjects in a very strict and controlled environment so there can be no cheating. The test subjects usually do not even know what the product “is” or what it’s “supposed to do”. They’re told very little, so it’s entirely focused on the results and not opinions. Independent clinical trials are one of the fairest and most accurate product trials available. You’re not just getting our thoughts; you’re getting the facts…

Now, do you give a rats a$$ about Clinical Trials?



Product application determines an improvement of skin moisturising at all the experimental monitored times. Differences between treated and untreated areas are statistically significant.


Both after 28 and 56 days of product use a statistically significant decrease in thigh circumference is recorded (mean values respectively by -0.7cm at T28 and -1.1cm at T56).


After 15 and 30 days of active product use (HS.11), a statistically significant decrease of the waistline circumference is recorded, both compared to baseline and to the placebo-treated group. The mean loss recorded in the waistline area is respectively by -0.5cm at T15 and by -0.9cm at T30. No variations are monitored in the placebo-treated group (HS.12).


In the T30min picture, it is possible to notice a decrease of periocular wrinkles visibility, blue coloured, since the colour of blue lines is less intense and lines become less defined/more dotted. The eye corner is marked by the white square.